n8n-mcp vs Langflow MCP server
Both are automation / agent builders MCP servers, and we ran both through the same test (node lookup, run fixture) in each app. n8n-mcp passed 4 of 4 apps we tested it in; Langflow MCP server passed 2 of 2.
Test results side by side
| n8n-mcp | Langflow MCP server | |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | Passed 2026-10-21 | Passed 2026-10-16 |
| Cursor | Passed 2026-10-21 | Passed 2026-10-16 |
| Claude Desktop | Passed 2026-10-19 | Not tested yet |
| ChatGPT (Codex) | Passed 2026-10-15 | Not tested yet |
| Tools exposed (protocol check) | 7 tools | 1 tools |
| GitHub stars | 23,069 | 155,761 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last push | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-17 |
Results from our own harness runs, dated per cell. Stars and last push from GitHub at our last data refresh. We don’t pick a winner here: which one fits depends on your app and setup.
What each does
n8n-mcp: Docs and node reference for building n8n workflows; can manage workflows if given an n8n API key.
Langflow MCP server: Call the flows in a Langflow project as tools.
