mcpdoc (LangChain) vs Docfork
Both are up-to-date docs for coding MCP servers, and we ran both through the same test (docs fact) in each app. mcpdoc (LangChain) passed 0 of 3 apps we tested it in; Docfork passed 0 of 3.
Test results side by side
| mcpdoc (LangChain) | Docfork | |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code | Failed 2026-10-15 | Failed 2026-10-15 |
| Cursor | Failed 2026-10-15 | Failed 2026-10-15 |
| Claude Desktop | Not tested yet | Not tested yet |
| ChatGPT (Codex) | Failed 2026-10-22 | Failed 2026-10-21 |
| Tools exposed (protocol check) | — | 2 tools |
| GitHub stars | 1,031 | 486 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Last push | 2026-08-20 | 2026-06-13 |
Results from our own harness runs, dated per cell. Stars and last push from GitHub at our last data refresh. We don’t pick a winner here: which one fits depends on your app and setup.
What each does
mcpdoc (LangChain): Serves llms.txt documentation files you choose to your coding agent, so it reads the real docs. The maker archived the repo.
Docfork: Fetches current documentation and code examples for libraries from Docfork's hosted docs index. The maker archived the repo.
